Whats webhard

what's webhard?

When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.

You must share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

노제휴 웹하드 The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.



There are the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.